No, she didn't tell me you were involved in her suspension, because all she has is the same suggestive circumstantial evidence that I do.
What she told me is that you are one of the five who knew about that old account.
I don't know for a fact that you instigated the report. I can't know that, any more than Jeff can know for a fact that you didn't.
Christopher, a problem with having behaved as you have behaved toward Poet, is that you are highly disadvantaged when your credibility regarding attempts to harm her is an issue.
You are have been harming her, Christopher, and have threatened, or promised, to continue doing so until you get your way.
I tend to believe what people say, unless there is strong reason to doubt their word. In this case, you've provided strong reason.
This isn't a very important issue, actually, so I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. A 15 day suspension is NOTHING compared to what you've put Poet through, and SI has put her through by failing to enforce the TOU regarding harassment, violations of privacy, threats, improper behavior, etc. |