SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (11430)5/8/2002 8:49:09 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (3) of 57684
 
"what was the historic P/S? I was thinking 7, pre-bubble."

Lizzie, first we would need to decide when the bubble started:

stockcharts.com[w,a]waclyiay[pb50!b200!f][vc60][iUb14!Uk14!Ul14!La12,26,9!Lf!Lc20]&pref=G

This is a chart of the ratio I discussed before. The nasdaq averages about 1/5 the price of the dow long term. Although many want to believe that the bubble started long ago, I don't think a bubble existed until around the time that the nasdaq broke to an all time low ratio vs. the dow, and that wasn't until Nov 1998. And that ratio still wasn't too out of line until just after April 1999. So if we assume the dow wasn't overpriced in Nov 1998, we would have to say that the nasdaq wasn't either. (In retrospect the dow was only selling at 17x 2000 earnings).

Ok, so BEFORE 11/98, what was the historic ps ratio on LEADING sw companies. I have gone back and I get 8-12. The bubble got companies well over 20.

1 to 2 is insanity. There is no other word for it. These companies have tremendous margins and roe.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext