SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 119.96+2.0%Dec 22 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (85263)5/8/2002 11:19:57 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) of 116820
 
Msg from gold_tutor "... Who gives a rat's ass [on] GPM..."

Message from gold_tutor
... hell is your "she's also been wrong" comeback
... [who] gives a rat's ass [about] 100% accurate,,, [end.]

Golly G Good'ism times 37,

The above words from one that refuses to acknowledge
any such not being 100% accurate, and those times when
the facts speak for themselves, and not for your words,
well then its a spin cycle extraordinary leaving everyone
to not cycle it back to you.

Lets see, price of gold broke over $300 and Gata Bill spoke
to identify and give credit to his Gata Army for this happening,
upon sandwhich you Click'ed "Rather be wrong than admit..."
telling us price of gold WILL fall below $300 aSoon, and thus
making your 100% accurate message aTruTh about GATA.

ok, Please tell us when price of gold will fall below $300
as based on your recent posts it should have already done so.

But then, just mayB your message to longone was really not about
what you posted about, but a message inside a message needing
no reading between the lines, as the lines speak clear.

a.k.a.
From: gold_tutor
May 8, 2002
"... courageous female analyst... later labelled by
jealous males as a bitch... " [end.]

as,
Golly everyone makes mistakes, and sometimes will even
do that backwards Walk to support a Talk of unTruTh.
so,
Might this be your way to be wrong without obtaining any label
of making a mistake, as the means was what was important,
not the end.

Just wondering,
and also wondering why you need another backwards Walk
to undo that backwards Walk to support a Talk of unTruTh.

4Sure E.C. might find it of interest in aSense if i expanded upon
that negative of a negative not equal to an unWalk of an unWalk,
as one is an addition for a cancel, and the other gets an increase
in the negative direction.

ak
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext