The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........ Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Street who wrote (1580)	5/10/2002 7:27:52 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (1) of 10167

I believe the prosecution framed the argument as "was a sawed-off shotgun a military weapon?" It was (trench guns, and Stevens made them for the Army at one time), but no one was there for Miller to assert this and the prosecution let the court believe it was not (and I believe this was unethical to hide truth from the SC). Shotguns were of course deemed military, but somehow they got the court to believe the short ones were not, and were merely weapons for highwaymen or strictly meant for concealment. The SC was pretty deficient to believe this without some research or testimony.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next