Hypothetically , E, you should be ashamed of yourself for publicly posting such false and groundless speculation. But, hypothetically, you seem to have lost all sense of honor in your pursuit of a cause that has obsessed you. Hypothetically, you would benefit from serious self-examination as to how far you are willing to go in abandoning truth as a standard in what you say.
What actually happened is that you said you didn't turn Poet in and I made the point (one you
still seem peculiarly incapable of grasping) that if, hypothetically, you had said, to, say, Dithers,
something like, "Gee, Poet complains that the TOU regarding harassment aren't enforced, but
she violated the TOU herself by having a second accn't under the name of apply_liberally!"...
If that had happened, you would be able to say that you "had nothing to do with" turning Poet
in, and yet you would have been--ever so innocently-- the supplier of the information that
Dithers, in this example, used to get Poet suspended. |
