SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.82+1.5%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (165105)5/14/2002 10:45:10 AM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Joe, Re: "I think he said he had 1.8 GHz. So to get to 2.3 GHz, he needs to overclock the FSB and memory by 28%, which can become iffy, even if the CPU is fine. Or it could be the CPU. I think the days of 50% overclock (like the first Celerons) are over."

You are correct. 28% is a lot to push on a motherboard, with so many common clock domains all based off the same source. Sure, you can now adjust PCI and AGP separately, as well as many other separate adjustments, but God knows how many other sensitive clocks are running out of spec when you crank up that front side bus....

At least in the days of Celeron, you were overclocking the board from 67MHz to 100MHz, and that usually had a lot of headroom. These days, board electricals haven't improved all that much, but logic is getting a helluva lot faster. In that respect, 50% overclocks are going to be rare, if at all possible, unless you are willing to live with a few instabilities like STR not working.

wbmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext