"Stock wiz"? When was I ever described by myself or anyone else as a stock wiz?
The issue is
Typical tout tactic. Get one argument destroyed and say "No, that's not the issue. The issue is..."
The issue, dear, was that you claimed that I either make a lot or intend to make a lot of money from ads by wooing touts and their traffic. I say that that claim is both incorrect and makes no sense.
You very clearly demonstrated that you had no idea what you were talking about and were simply throwing out another assumption that matched with what you'd like to believe or would like others to believe, and were presenting it as "The Truth". A "truth" that is quickly proven unlikely by very simple and easy filtering through some logic.
This is a common pattern with you and it damages your cred needlessly.
Or, in simple words, why do you claim I make lots of advertising dollars from touts (or plan to), when you, by your own admission, can't even venture a ballpark guess about the dollar amount or even the percentage of revenue?
You presented something that was even less than a WAG and called it Gospel.
Regarding the other tripe, apparently you haven't been an observer. It takes only minutes of DD (that's short for "Due Diligence", dear) to determine that iHub's demographic is changing dramatically.
The reference to the size of your cajones was about your asking me to post financial specifics, which I won't do. The problem was that you were posting opinion (posing as fact) that led me to believe you knew what you were talking about, but, alas, you didn't. Again. <g> |
