SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (47539)5/15/2002 11:31:47 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
But even though it makes it harder to explain or understand my subsequent posts, I will not disclose them without Poet's permission, which I certainly do not have and do not expect to obtain. So I'm sorry, but I'm just asking you to understand that the public messages you're seeing are like the tip of the iceberg, and that without looking under the water it may be hard to understand their actions or reason for existence.

Please tell us enough about the "relationship" you had with Poet to explain how in the conceivable world, how, HOW, its nature could justify the stalking, the insistence on posting insinuating posts referring to them, the following her about. WHAT KIND OF RELATIONSHIP WOULD JUSTIFY ANY OF YOUR UNWELCOME ATTENTIONS TO A VERY UPSET, REPELLED AND CREEPED-OUT WOMAN?
What kind? What is under the "tip of the iceberg," (that tip being your unwelcome posts?)

What kind of posts from the past would justify your claims to a continuing relationship, your suing to remove a restriction about posting to and about her, your persistent unwelcome attentions?

Give us a hint. What kind?

Tell us. Because I can't hypothesize anything at all that would justify what you've done.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext