SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Vitesse Semiconductor

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan Spillane who wrote (707)7/11/1997 10:21:00 PM
From: Robert G. Harrell   of 4710
 
Dan, knowing what a smart investor you have proven yourself to be, I'm glad to see you have finally seen the light about this stock. When I heard James O'Shaughnessy preaching the gospel of low price to sales ratios, I started doing some calculations. He only buys stocks with price to sales of 1.5 or less. I think VTSS was around 14 at the time. It really scared me. I finally bailed out at $54 the end of January and put my money in a retailer with a P/S < 1 and slept much better.

If you haven't read O'Shaughnessy's book What Works On Wall Street, I highly recommend it. I've had it for six months but finally read it last week.

On page 280 he says: "The other four losing strategies buy stocks whose prices have been pushed to unsustainable levels by investors' huge expectations. This is reflected by the stocks' high multiples. With strategies like cornerstone growth available, there's no reason to buy stocks with the highest price-to-earnings, price-to-book, price-to-sales, or price-to-cashflow ratio. The odds for such stocks are about as bad as the story is good. Investors who buy these stocks always brag about the handful that work out and conveniently forget the majority that don't. The evidence is painfully clear--if you habitually buy stocks with good stories but the highest multiples, you'll do much worse than the market."

Regards,
Bob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext