SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John M who wrote (15625)5/16/2002 9:35:08 PM
From: F9driver  Read Replies (1) of 15703
 
BullBoards Member Forums My BullBoards
All Forum Search


Jump to *ELH Forum


SUBJECT: RE: found this on SI Posted By: OILFINDER
Post Time: 5/16/02 15:20
« Previous Message Next Message »

From: John M
Message 17473769
Here is my two cents worth on WWD:

- If my last information was correct on the water production, the #1 well is making 3000 BWPD/MMscfd gas produced. So if you want to flow at 20 MMscfd you have to get rid of 3000 BWPD/MMscfd X 20 MMscfd = 60,000 BWPD. That's a lot of water.

- A good disposal well can suck down about 10,000 bpd of water. So we might need 6 or more wells to satisfy the requirements.

Comments from Yahoo:
What kind of morons would produce 60,000 barrels of water from ELH #1, assuming water disposal wells available? If draderd's fishing buddy (petroleum engineer?) is correct, this high water cut is being sourced (conned) from below the gas/water contact.

The connate water is either being sourced from channels in the cement sheath surrounding the liner (bad cement job), or is being sourced from a large vertical fracture system.

If production testing proves there is proportionate increase (“3000 BWPD/MMscfd”) as the choke is opened up, then a prudent operator would attempt to squeeze off the water source and re-complete the well higher in the hydrocarbon column.

OILFINDER
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext