SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DavesM who wrote (256434)5/17/2002 10:09:51 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
Hi DavesM,

Re: Are you in favor of limiting malpractice awards?

Absolutely. The Dutch have a much more sensible approach than we do. They have legislated schedules of payments for malpractice, which eliminates most of the profit motivation for trial lawyers, and prevents the runaway juries we're forced to contend with here. What I don't favor is the sort of curbs that the likes of Steve Forbes have in mind, because Forbes seems basically willing to absolve the worst of ethical and moral lapses of corporate/professional wrongdoers because they are members of the right class. There has to be a middle ground where victims can be compensated, and practitioners feel that they aren't threatened with runaway malpractice insurance costs if they perform to a reasonable standard of care.

Re: My guess is most of those countries that have "control" of their "Nationalized" healthcare costs are engaging in rationing of healthcare

Exactly. There's no other way to do it. Triage is a permanent feature of the health care industry. In countries like Great Britain and Canada, the trade off is time vs. money. In the US the tradeoff is one class versus another. Which is the better system? I can't decide.They're certainly both less than ideal.

-Ray
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext