Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 230.92

+3.1%

Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (63913)	5/18/2002 5:29:15 PM
From: Tito L. Nisperos Jr.	Read Replies (1) of 70976

Jacob, for Paul V and also me, we find it more convenient to use the prices as they occured for comparison purposes. That is because long time ago we found out AMAT investors use the split unadjusted prices as guide to trade presently. Yes, we know we doubled our money after each split. I'm sure that if Paul V used Split adjusted prices, he would not have come up with 101 plus a few cents as High for 1999. Others who relied solely on PE calculations sold out at 30 more or less during that time. As for you, although you strongly believed that PE (or something like that) matters a lot --- you were wise enough to have closed your eyes and waited for 127 before saying --- "Okay, that's it I'm getting out!"

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next