SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: George Coyne who wrote (257760)5/22/2002 7:24:50 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
Hi George,

Re: Just to be sure I understand what you are saying

You understand what I wrote correctly. Think of it this way George, I'm a bleeding heart, an naif and a liberal who doesn't have what it takes to succeed in the realm of electoral politics. Those who achieve the highest levels of achievement in our political system simply must be more cynical and manipulative than I am. Cf. Robert Caro's new bestseller about LBJ, "The Master of the Senate".

Now one thing we know for sure is that GWB has lied to us about how important he thinks polling is. He told us that he's a man of principal and polling doesn't matter. But there is abundant evidence that the Karl Roves of the Administration are completely driven by polls and are responding to them in a suitable fashion for manipulative advantage.

So, when I say that a suicide bombing on Times Square would be good for business, I base that on the historical record. When the suicide bombings began occurring in Israel in the latest round of escalations of maniacal revenge acts, PM Sharon's approval ratings skyrocketed as Israelis in large number acted as human herds always do, that is to rally round the leader. This is an exploitable aspect of human behavior. And the last thing I would like to suggest is that the Bush team are stupid or naive about the ways and means of manipulating public opinion.

I'm a cynical observer of the process. But I'm a lot less dangerous to America than the cynical manipulators of public opinion that I observe working overtime on "damage control" for Dubya. The current crescendo of criticism about the neurotic need for secrecy espoused by the Mal-Administration must be met with some wag-the-dog distraction. The scenario I present is only one of many that I assume are under active consideration.

A chemical attack on the Congressional leadership, to follow up on the anthrax attack, would also get the message across quite nicely, don't you think? It would certainly be a swell way to intimidate one's enemies and let the small men of the Congress know who the boss is, wouldn't it?

-Ray
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext