SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (70961)5/23/2002 8:24:04 PM
From: augieboo  Read Replies (2) of 99280
 
Zeev, I've been looking at the problem of replacing EMLX
in the Q. To come up with candidates, I ran a Scan for
NASDAQ stocks, with an average daily volume over the past
year of >500,000 and a minimum daily range over the past
year of greater than $1.00.

Only 8 stocks made the cut: CCMP, CEPH, EBAY, IDPH,
MXIM, MYGN, NVDA, QLGC. (I will omit QLGC from further
discussion for obvious reasons.)

Ticker: Today's Close (TC): $1.00 as % of TC:
===================================================
CCMP 50.12 1.99
CEPH 58.41 1.71
EBAY 58.68 1.70
IDPH 47.30 2.11
MXIM 50.21 1.99
MYGN 25.36 3.94
NVDA 35.73 2.8

MYGN clearly gives you the biggest possible bang for the
buck, on a percentage basis, but it has two negatives vis-a-vis
second-place finisher NVDA; it's a BIO, so it's likely to
crater soon, (tough to play the long side of a falling elevator),
and it has a daily volume of "only" 830k compared to NVDA's
10 million plus.

I don't know whether MYGN has the aforementioned "latency"
problem, (or even how to figure it out), but here's
a "perf" chart of the NAS, the current Q stocks, plus MYGN
and NVDA for your fun and enjoyment. <g>
stockcharts.com

augie
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext