SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.18-0.5%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Gryba who wrote (80569)5/23/2002 8:29:05 PM
From: ElmerRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
THe quantihurtz rating was based on the Tbird performance. I think a 3Ghz TBird would eat a 3Ghz NW alive. I don't know why you think otherwise.

The Quantihurts performance rating for a TBird was relative to a Palomino. So if the rating system holds true, 3400+ is the performance that would equal a 3.4GHz Palomino, and that doesn't even use SPEC as the measure. So a 3GHz NW with a 533MHz FSB would almost certainly beat a 3.4GHz Palomino, meaning that unless AMD actually defines what they mean about a 3400+ Hammer (something they have refused to do), it's logical to conclude a Hammer will probably not beat a NorthWood. You guys believe the hype but I don't.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext