SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (168535)5/28/2002 3:43:42 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Well that is quite sad IMHO. It is like letting a small cancer growth turning into a metastasis to the fear of a surgery.

3) The Chiefs also reportedly fear Saddam's chemical- and biological-weapons capabilities. Liberals have told us for a long time that the possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by a rogue wouldn't deter the U.S. — so, no need for missile defense — but instead make it certain that the U.S. would launch a preemptive attack. Well, now we have a real-world test — and the U.S. is indeed being deterred. WMD has now become that much more valuable to every rogue around the world. Just imagine if Saddam definitely had nuclear weapons — the Joint Chiefs probably wouldn't even want to think about invading. This is a sign that Bush's war on WMD is being lost with every passing day because the closer countries get to getting a WMD capability, the less likely we are to do anything about it — time, as the president once remarked, is not on our side.

nationalreview.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext