SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tommaso who wrote (169030)5/30/2002 6:46:04 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) of 436258
 
Tom I disagree that there were "frightening losses" on the put writers.

They hedge by going short. I doubt they lost much if anything. If they did no see it coming we have the snapback rally to resistance where they go short and get out of the way.

I remain convinced that the option sellers seldom if ever lose cause they delta hedge. Then we rally to max pain or fall to max pain as appropriate but I bet the overall amt of leap puts on CMGI etc is so tinny compared to the CSCO DELL QQQ MSFT options that such crap was nothing but a side show anyway.

I had someone today refer to Max Pain on HGMCY looked it up and biggest position was 160+ options. Had to laugh. Small crap like this is totally 100% meaningless.

Do you have counts on CMGI?
If you got in near the top and paid 20-30 (50?) points the stock could fall that far and all the seller had to do was short anywhere on the way down to hedge. Since brokerages most likely sold those I am sure they did.

M
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext