SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.14-0.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (81125)5/30/2002 8:47:17 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (3) of 275872
 
Dear Intelianer, Remember - when Intel's CPUs blew past the frequency of the Athlon, MHz (frequency) suddenly wasn't important.
Right? You said so.
All the AMD fan boys said so.
Jerry Sanders began to say it...
So you and the AMD fan boys adopted the "performance is what counts" mantra.


I and others adopted that mantra because Intel CPU's had higher MHz but lower performance.

So let us just suppose that Banias can offer superb performance at lower clock frequency.

Then it should be judged on how high its performance is, which is probably someplace between a Celeron P4 and a regular P4. Even if it runs at 1.5 GHz, it should sell for whatever its performance level is.

You AMD fan boys should love it - embrace it - praise it to the moon - right?

Yes, I applaud the idea of CPU's selling for whatever their performance level is, regardless of who makes them or what their MHz level is.

I agree, MHz is meaningless, and I never said otherwise. Looks like Intel will ahve to embrace the same philosophy as I.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext