The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dayniteshadow who wrote (5533)	5/31/2002 12:04:48 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (3) of 46821

Hi DNS, I doubt UWB will replace the shipping .11b and .11a WLANs, but it has fine applicability where client power consumption is paramount. Note that UWB still trades off rate and range, just on the lower end of the bits/sec/Hz scale. The article on BE Labs implies they sent DVDs (~10Mbps) to 100 meters. IEEE Study Group 802.15.3a is looking at 100Mbps at 10 meters ieee802.org but the same technology could go farther, slower... I'd hazard a guess that the Y2K 50Mbps at 10 meter designs could do what BE claims, and Moore's law keeps moving the goalposts [both for LANs and PANs]. Whether the regulators move the goalposts is another story... petere

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next