Rubicon Minerals Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rubicon Minerals

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: russet who wrote (71)	6/1/2002 12:48:57 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) of 470

Thank you for that detailed response. I can now understand better why the cut-off at 65%. While the website says it is an oxide ore, that just doesn't tell the whole tale. I did note, however, they were getting 65% of .049 g/t...which is an awful lot of effort for just the 65%! Again, my sincere appreciation for your informative reply, Russett. I learned something from you today. I'd like to ask a follow-up question if I may re: some of the covalent complexes formed and post precip/carbon col/or electro treatments... g_t

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next