SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Earlie who wrote (170377)6/5/2002 12:54:26 PM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (2) of 436258
 
how's this for a letter, posted on RMpro

Jeff Matthews
A Draft Letter to My Investors

6/05/02 11:35 AM EDT

From: Jeffrey L. Matthews
To: Limited Partners of Ram Partners, L.P.

Date: June 5, 2002

This is to inform you of recent developments at Ram Partners, L.P., which should result in enhanced future performance and better returns on your investment.

We are selling several of our poor-performing investments at a substantial loss. This will allow us to focus on our core investments and better address the challenges of today’s difficult investment climate. Since these investment losses were covered by last year’s one-time, non-cash, non-recurring charge-off, they do not affect our reported pro-forma performance results, which continue to be excellent.

At the same time, we are taking another $10 million one-time, non-cash, non-recurring charge, representing anticipated losses on future lousy investments we might make.

This additional non-recurring charge will allow us to lower our cost structure, lower the bar, and clear the desks for enhanced growth in future quarters, without damaging the excellent track record we have developed.

By taking this one-time, non-cash, non-recurring charge, we clear the decks for a brighter future at Ram Partners. I remind you that immediately following last year’s one-time non-recurring charge Ram Partners experienced several quarters of excellent returns.

We would, of course, encourage you to consider this charge a non-event. While our unique “pro-forma” method of reporting and concomitant history of non-recurring charges have not been cleared by our accounting firm, I would point out that many large companies, IBM among them, do precisely the same thing.

Thank you for your support!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext