SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (14248)6/5/2002 10:30:51 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
Therefore human activity can effect atmospheric temperature. Of course. Perfectly obvious.

Then why did you argue with me and ask me to prove it?

But that and related questions are exactly what is under dispute. If there were not Kyoto Treaty or equivalent, there would be no political dispute.

I just said that I wasn't advocating the Kyoto treaty. If you're interested enough to do the research, you will find that I have never advocated the Kyoto treaty. If fact, I'm on record for expressing my disappointment that the Bush Pere administration set us on the path to it. Yet you felt you had to throw me four paragraphs about the faults of the Kyoto Treaty. Why is that?

The Kyoto treaty may have triggered the dispute, but the problem is the political polarization, which is so bad that we can't even have a discussion of the subject without running amok. The Kyoto Treaty isn't a problem because we're not signing it. The fact that we can't discuss the matter of global climate change in a sensible way is the problem. IMO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News