SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: telecomguy who wrote (10495)6/6/2002 12:35:38 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) of 11568
 
It's no different than selling competitive local service, except that they then bundle fixed fee/unlimited use long distance into the product. As for heavy users being the only takers, resulting in losses, I doubt it. First, many low and moderate volume callers will take it simply because unlimited anything at a modest fixed price seems like a bargain - some probably thinking "hey, I can call Mom more and not worry about the phone bill." Second, what's the marginal cost of a LD minute? I doubt it's much - probably barely measurable. I'd bet there's more money in how many customers you have than in how many more minutes you can bill a given one. Third, I'd expect that fixed monthly fees would also result in better collections.

Didn't AOL say the same thing in resisting fixed fee/unlimited use Internet access pricing a few years back?

BTW, what makes you think $50 won't cover the payments to the RBOCs (ILECs)? I pay BellSouth $17.45 for a residential line. I doubt the Telecom Act would allow an ILEC to charge a CLEC three times what they charge me.

Are you really a "telecomguy" or just another naysayer?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext