SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (12199)6/6/2002 9:37:27 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) of 12475
 
William Hickman:

What beats me is that in the case of eastern Pakistan border Pakistan is insisting on having foreign troops (which is possibly Western troops) to monitor that border. They are not agreeing to India's proposal of a patrol team consisting only of Indian and Pakistani troops.

On the other hand, on its western border which is infested with Taliban and Al Quada folks, Pakistan does not want any foreign troops. They prefer to station only their troops.

And I also do not understand why India does not want foreign troops to be part of the monitoring team. Probably politics is playing a role here, IMO. They will agree to a multinational force in the LoC if the Pakistanis agree to a multinational force at the Afghanistan/Pakistan border also. Again, I am pretty sure that the US and the UK would not want to get involved in a multination monitoring force across the LoC. hence India offering a bilateral monitoring team serves the purpose of the Western strategy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext