SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (49357)6/7/2002 12:37:13 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
But of course we're faced with the classic problem that bureaucracies can't function on the "I know it when I see it" principle. Once doors are open, they're open.

And since SSA relies on state law, if they find a right of benefits in this case, it must be because the state law creates the legal right, and then what other unexpected legal rights might it create?

So far, we have tended to say that a child of a sperm donor to whom the child is not otherwise related has no rights inherit from the sperm donor. Are we going to modify that? If so, how do we define when the child of a sperm donor does have such rights?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News