Take the Money and Run Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Take the Money and Run

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gypsees who wrote (2138)	6/7/2002 1:45:01 AM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (2) of 17639

Ahhh, that's the question. The answer is earnings have to catch up. Simple as that. TER is supposed to earn 54 cents per share in 2003. If it can, that it is not as overpriced as it first appearns - if you want to look that far ahead. I don't. As for AMAT, it is supposed to earn 78 cents per share in FY2003. If they can do that, no problem. The question as always is whether they and others will come through. Some stocks like ESST already have a low PE and are expecting to report strong growth, so fundamentally it should be a safer play. I think the answer for me is the stick to CURRENT low PE stocks rather than ones that are relying on earnings in 2003.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next