And I'd be satisfied that I'd done what I ought to do, and wouldn't have the least regret that I'd acted under the assumption that the parent would be appreciative. I would regret and disapprove of your attitude (and would certainly try to see to it that my child and yours didn't spend any unsupervised time together), but of course one sees parents all the time who are doing a bad job keeping their child's life responsibly "under control," so I wouldn't be astounded.
Now, if a child of mine were, curious, accessing internet pornography (and had happened across, let's say, images of a naked woman, a look of agony on her face, legs spread, bound with ropes, gagged, and being whipped by a leather-garbed female and masturbated upon by male or two) (or perhaps of a young girl appearing to be a school girl being vaginally, anally and orally penetrated by three older males) (or how about an old fashioned gang bang? Or "golden showers", w/lots of erections? That's a cute idea for a child to entertain) (mustn't forget sex between females and dogs maybe a lot like Rover, that's there, too, of course) (shall I go on? Pornography does not mean pretty nude young ladies) while at the library as I was browsing upstairs in the fiction section, and someone called it to my attention, I would thank them in the same way I would thank someone for letting me know my child had drifted to the deep end of the pool without my knowledge. |
