SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Lillie who wrote (76377)6/8/2002 7:04:48 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) of 99280
 
One of the reasons I use the Q is that often they move in sequential tandem (most recently the order is EMLX, QLGC, BRCD, BRCM, GNSS), when my daily indicators say "jump" they are often with ten minutes of an actual lunch tactic bottom (more so when the lows are between 11:15 and 11:45, less so when they are precipitated early due to a gap and crap.) When I am right, I sometimes get them within a quarter of the local low, when I am wrong, I am often forced to take a loss. Many times, I jump in after the turn has happened already (check my most recent jumps in CCMP and KLAC, particularly the string of very minimal gains in KLAC despite some major moves in the stock, and you will see the flaw of your observation <g>), all missing the bottoms by yards.... I think that many here have selective memory and remember only the lucky entries. In the first half of May, without the May 7th lucky stay overnight in the Q, my Q trading results would have been negative (they were a loss of $.18/share for BRCM despite the $2 gain on May 8th, luckily, that overnight stay yielded a big $7 or so for just QLGC and more than $4 for EMLX).

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext