Curiouser and Curiouser Department: No PAPER TRAIL LEADS TO PERPS
Hi Ron,
I can't seem to get away from the notion that there's way too much information about 9/11 that just doesn't jibe with what the official explanations to the public have been.
Here's some really interesting URLs. The first is the words of FBI head Mueller saying that there is no "paper trail" linking 9/11 to al Queda:
fbi.gov
Mueller: "The hijackers also left no paper trail. In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper – either here in the U.S. or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot. The hijackers had no computers, no laptops, no storage media of any kind. They used hundreds of different pay phones and cell phones, often with prepaid calling cards that are extremely difficult to trace. And they made sure that all the money sent to them to fund their attacks was wired in small amounts to avoid detection.
In short, the terrorists had managed to exploit loopholes and vulnerabilities in our systems, to stay out of sight, and to not let anyone know what they were up to beyond a very closed circle."
Incongruously, he goes on to say: "And it gave us clear and definitive proof that al Qaeda was behind the strikes."
Huh?
*****************
Then there's this list, which I haven't seen verification of from any other source, of the passengers on the flights on 9/11. None of the supposed 19 hijackers are listed on the manifests.
geocities.com
************************
So, we have the FBI chief telling us there's no paper trail of proof, and manifests that don't show any hijackers. Curious, isn't it?
-Ray |
