A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: peter michaelson who wrote (336)	6/11/2002 12:16:54 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) of 717

Peter I don't ascribe to hanging em' high on every charge But based on his past actions, his greed, and his nature- many of these charges fall right into place. Don't you find it too coincidental how he timed his recent "PR's" within a day or two prior to an official gov't announcement?. Wouldn't you agree that most of these same post bubble calls have been overwhelmingly in the long established seedy OTC:BB. They are/were useless to most and were centered around criminal pasts of mgt. Even most of his short calls during the frenzy were ill-timed and required an excessive amount of margin and prayer, if one were to eventually profit from them. I don't have an MBA and I wasn't impressed with his repeated rants that net stocks were grossly overpriced in comparison to "old economy" stocks. Nor with his methods. Biz 101 made that clear enough. Playing the net stocks was a pure gamble into uncharted territory. Tony/amr was no The facts and his postings demonstrate that he was desperate to preserve his status - post bubble. And based on what I've witnessed, he'd do it at any cost.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next