Yes, Thats a good suggestion that works quick & easy for
those already tuned-in to Silicon Investor and those not but
also have experience in understanding that what you see is
not always what you want. For my example, Samex Mining,
if I created a second thread for this company that has in the
last few weeks risen from a long and poor performance, to that
of very good now, that many folks who invested over these past
years have simply unBookMarked the thread and would upon
ab Si search get two hits, and 1/2 of the time they will not see
the new thread and go to the old one, and of these 1/2 will not
read the last old posts telling of a new thread, and they will not
obtain that in the old header which remains un-touch'able :o)
(or)
Yes, I do agree about your comments having a quick
and workable solution, but it would be best for Silicon Investor
to put its best face forward to collect new members. Its that
circle that feeds on itself... visitors see a poor web site,
causing few to join as paying members, causing Silicon Investor
to have cash flow problems, causing layoffs reducing maintenance,
causing a poorer web site image, causing..... and actually
causing existing members to post posts like this one that
speaks of asking for help and not getting it from those who
run this web site. But now i'am babbling, sorry. Creating
news threads because Silicon Investor will not "invest" in itself,
to me is just us members doing work-arounds thats reflects
poorly on Silicon Investor, and bottom line as far as i'am concerned,
Silicon Investor's attempt here to reduce costs have the counter
productive results to reduce revenue.
doug |
