SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (14713)6/12/2002 8:44:17 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
Any idea on how to find the text of the Act of Congress giving Bush authority to use military force after 9/11?
Message 17584891
Work back through that two or three posts to see what were after.


The topic has been floating around elsewhere on SI. There was an HJ [Joint Resolution] 62 that was sponsored by 9 members of the House on 9-13 [declaring war on anyone and everyone that committed acts of terror]. It promptly was sent to the House International Committee on 9-13. It's been there ever since [Hence the phrase 'dead in committee'].

I think the real answer to your question is "the Budget". Pres proposes expenditures, Congress approves it; it's authorized. Clean and simple and no debate on the pros and cons of declaring war.

I've sort of thought that's the reason that there has been no official declaration of war since WWII. The Congress caucuses in conference rooms, restrooms, by e-mail, by phone and in the hallways. They agree that we should go to war. They opt for the action to approve the war through a budgetary process and avoid the debates on the floor...questions like...'Can we declare war on a stateless group of terrorists?' Why shouldn't we just stay the hell out of Vietnam or Korea? Why confuse the American people? Just fund the damn thing. Without the debate, you can more easily assert 'moral clarity'.

jttmab
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext