SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (50732)6/13/2002 12:46:47 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
Off the cuff declarations are hardly binding.

Not if, as AJ states, there is no offer, acceptance, and consideration.

Where those three elements exist, there is a contract.

Those three elements existed here, there was a contract.

You need to learn basic contract law.

BTW, your ground seems to be chaning. Early on your were accepting the existence of a contract because you were making your case by quoting the grounds for recission of a contract, which would have been meaningless if there had been no contract -- you can't reciss a non-contract. So you had made it to that point earlier, and were trying to find a legitimate reason for Laz to have backed out of the contract.

Now, realizing that there were no such legitimate reasons, you're trying to argue there was no contract in the first place. But it's too late for that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News