Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50981)	6/14/2002 12:53:11 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) of 82486

That said, with respect to your implied request that language use here be moderated, I will refrain from posting that again as long as others here follow the same guidelines, and name calling, insulting, etc. are eliminated from this thread. I am NOT on a campaign against name calling and insults--I do have both feet firmly planted on the ground--only suggesting that people use an accurate name, not one that is either off target or unjustifiably strong or both. I'm not clear why liar was a ridiculous charge. He promised A. He did B. In my book, that makes someone a liar. I disagree with your usage of the word. If someone promises A, assuming he did promise A, and then does B, there are other plausible explanations than an intent to not fulfill the promise at the time that the promise was made, which is what "liar" connotes. You may be able to argue "renege" but "lie" assumes intent that has not been demonstrated.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next