A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (497)	6/17/2002 12:52:07 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) of 717

Jorj--Nicely written. Seems we're both in agreement for a fair up and a fair down. Regarding this: >>>What concerns me though is that people are choosing to see every action that A@P ever made as some nefarious action..."<<< I don't think folks are for want to go down that path. I think it's more a matter of that road having pretty much gotten paved by A@P's own actions, his own descriptions of his actions. Over several years of participating in these forums I've had some great dialogue with what I consider very respectable shorters, ones that didn't resort to gurrella tactics. I recall how several of 'em showed up in a posting forum, announced their positions relative to the performance of the company, indicated they thought the price would go down and that they were therefore short. The stock did go down, not a lot but a bit. They politely announced they covered and stated they were moving on to other pastures. Not a single insult hurled throughout the entire process. I guess what's really the crux here is that gangbanging, longtitude or shortitude, has deservedly gotten a bad name and to a point where there finally now appears a very extensive investigation by the .org and .gov types.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next