SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Edscharp who wrote (78097)6/17/2002 5:28:18 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen  Read Replies (3) of 122087
 
No, I'm saying it looks to me like the government may have to settle for only a pair of charges, one of which is the extortion charge.

And something I hadn't thought about until now, but someone else's comment about that being out of character for him kinda strikes me.

And that is that the extortion charge and it being out of character for what we know about Anthony (and one of my first comments about this was that if that charge is true, it's going to be one of the most disappointing things I've heard) begs the question: "Did he receive money or shares for his silence, or is that only an allegation being leveled by one or a number of company executives who, by virtue of them having been targeted by Anthony in the first place, are likely not exactly well-known for the veracity of everything they tell people."

Or, in a language other than Bob-eze, are the folks alleging extortion the same folks who are illegally heading up public companies, or have lied before?

For example, if the CEO of UPCA claims Anthony tried to extort shares from him, that'd be a relevant bit of information as I think most of us would dismiss that allegation right away. And we're obviously way smarter than Breen. hehe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext