Unlike you, I have no need to make up fancy dehumanizing names for my fellow posters.
and
At the most I disagree with them
OMG.
Girl, you carry self-delusion to heretofore unchronicled heights.
How about 'molester' and 'liar' as dehumanizing, vilifying names?! I could compile such a compendium of noun-avoidance vilification! But alas, although art is long, life is brief, and I must go.
And "fancy" they sure are, in that they are representative examples of your habitual name-calling style -- Calling someone a molester w/o the use of the noun. Fancy, indeed, and clever, too, enough so that it evidently fooled you yourself!
I've pointed that out before -- your method of namecalling and vilfying. There is no more vicious and dedicated vilifier on SI than you. You even vilify the newly dead to the decedent's mourners. Jesus, X.
Your friend CH [JUST KIDDING! I know you don't like him! I know you disapprove of his behavior! You don't even fraternize in a way that would cause confusion, you don't even offer him moral support during his slanders and 'molestations,' no, pas de tout! I know this because from time to time you post that disclaimer!] utilizes that same name-calling method, so I wonder if that shared skill represents something common in your background. (Name Calling Without Nouns 101?)
Please do not say again that your reactions are probably similar to mine. Almost anything is better than that. Go back to the 'disagreement' of writing woof woof woof woof post after post, I prefer that 'disagreement.'
"At the most I disagree with them."
gasp |
