Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (51443)	6/18/2002 6:04:25 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) of 82486

That is like saying if a child does not want to eat it is not the parents responsibility to see that they are fed. I have said that it is the parents' role to motivate young students, so you're mixing up roles here. More accurate would be to say that if a child doesn ot eat it's not the restaureant's job to see that they eat. Which I hope we both agree with. It's the restaurant's job to put wholesome food in front of the child, not to force it down his mouth. It is the parent's job to make sure that the child has adequate nutrition. But if the child doesn't want to eat, and will not be harmed by missing a meal (as, for example, a diabetic might), IMO the parent should say fine, but you get no food until the next meal. And enforce that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next