THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (14947)	6/18/2002 11:40:36 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) of 21057

Now why would he sign this? We MUST prove we are right thinking person madam. That turns out to have been about it. What an odd discussion it was. First of all, each thing N raised, they agreed with. And they didn't seem very familiar with what they'd signed, either of them. I can't tell you how odd it was. Here was the oddest: N talked this morning to two other signers. He asked why they'd signed that document. And... they hadn't. The man said that he hadn't signed anything "in nine years," and the woman said she had read it but declined to sign it. They both speculated that one of the two we were with on Sunday had put them down on the list without their permission. Life is so weird. When one sees such lists of names, now, one will have to assume that some of them don't agree with what they signed and others didn't sign at all.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next