Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tekboy who wrote (32686)	6/19/2002 8:22:35 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 281500

no one has commented on the Grenville Byford piece.. "The Wrong War" by Grenville Byford Most of the article consists of "Proving" that we can't define terrorism on an absolute basis, and that we will work to our own best interest by not using the term. I kind of feel about defining "Terrorists" like the Judges in the '30s felt about Pornography. "I know it when I see it." . The "moral clarity" in the rhetoric of the "war on terrorism" is more apparent than real. It takes a one-dimensional view of a multidimensional problem, and the sooner that rhetoric is retired the better. Interests first, ends second, means third -- this is how America thinks. It should be how it talks as well. Bush has already got in enough trouble with his "axis of evil" speech. If he got away from talking about "Terrorists" he would really catch hell. This piece comes across to me as a "Think Tank" presentation. Nice exposition for the Chattering Classes, but does not correspond to reality.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next