SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.16-0.3%10:25 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TGPTNDR who wrote (83073)6/20/2002 4:29:58 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
tgp, Re: "What were the specs ton the 3800 they ran against?"

sun.com
store.sun.com

Sun prices these systems with 900MHz UltraSparc III processors, and 8-way systems start at $234k. The mid-planes get 9.6GB/s of bandwidth, so the system is configured for reasonably high performance. But contrast that against the estimated base cost of a 4-way Itanium 2 system, whose base cost is supposed to be ~$40k. With 4x the performance at less than one fifth the cost, I can see why Reuters is enthusiastic about Itanium 2.

Re: "How would it have done against a 15K?"

You mean these?

store.sun.com

So if the 8-way Sun Fire 3800 isn't fast enough, you'd be willing to upgrade to the $1.5M Sun Fire 15k? And you'd suggest this over a $40k 4-way Itanium 2 system?

I'm sure the former will outperform, but what is the added cost worth to a corporation? It looks like Itanium 2 could potentially save a company millions of dollars in IT spending. And there will eventually be 16-way and greater Itanium 2 systems to compare as well.

wbmw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext