Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 41.41

+2.2%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (166785)	6/21/2002 5:32:12 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Hi Duke, RE: "Someone at Enron was fraudulent [supposively] through cash bonus" --------------- Oops, I just saw my error in that paragraph. I should have said, 'supposively' through. I see why you took issue with it as it was written (not intended). When I type fast, I can get sloppy on tangentials. That error changed the meaning away from my point which was: It's illogical for the Greenspan/Buffett/etc. to blame A while ignoring B, unless the composition of A and B are different in ways that would justify this, which it doesn't. (In fact, my follow-on point is that A, options, is actually better tool for growth than B, cash bonsues.) Regards, Amy J

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next