SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott Mc who wrote (3508)6/21/2002 10:10:27 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn  Read Replies (1) of 11633
 
On the contrary
I believe I have shown
1. That rights and warrants are dilutive (accounting 101)
2. Trust of trusts reduces the total payout going to the shareholder.(accounting 101)

----- Hardly please show the post. I dispelled these easily enough. I showed that the payouts did not decrease as you said they would, the month afterwards the rights issue , the payout was the same and has been the same for EIT ever since. As for SDT the small drop in payout was more a result of lower commodity prices and not as a result of the issue of rights. Because it fell a good couple of months afterwards. I asked in return for specific trust data which proved your assertion. The only response was from you that maybe they would have gone up. That is not proof not in the slightest. So again provide some real trust numbers, YOU CAN'T. So until you do so your just spouting textbook jargon which does not correspond to the real world numbers. ---------

Your trust has been going up, sort of a rising tide raises all boats,

---------- I provided again real world data in a previous post to you , a chart of SDT from late oct to dec of last year which showed it rising and rising substantially after its most recent rights issue. All at a time when the other trusts were falling and falling hard because of a sharp fall in oil prices --------

if it was declining (as it would if trusts were(the tide going out)) you would not be so happy about constantly forking over dollars to buy shares which were continuously dropping in price.

--------- IF being the key word here. And documented here in these past posts of mine are numerous examples of me buying and buying steadily on weakness. Particularly when the doom and gloomers here were saying that ngas was going to go below $1 and the trusts were going to stop paying out and many were going to disappear. Only months later to see the turn around occur and occur substantially from the lows which I took full advantage of. Knowing full well the outcome. Check the past posts. And that is how my results are able to out do all others. CONSISTENTLY ---

Compare it to Riocan or Ultima over the years

----- My own results with this one SDT.UN and the others I hold and accumulating on weakness when weakness occurs. As per the example I gave with the real world numbers for accumulating PWI on weakness and not bailing and going into something else . As well as by partaking in rights and warrants when made available over the years. And the use of a sizeable leverage arrangement. ""MY METHOD""" as I have outlined here in this forum since my first post. Shows results (documented) that compare much better than any other documented with past fact over the years. And that includes the 2 you mention above. PERIOD. -------------------

Trusts have been the place to be, why do you think everyone and their mother has been issuing them??
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext