SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dale Baker who wrote (14674)6/23/2002 8:06:18 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (1) of 78753
 
Dale,

First, I never stated that ALD is "better" than MCGC.

Instead, I stated that I, too, was eyeing MCGC; however, I chose not to invest.

I don't understand the mentality of averaging down in broken stocks mired in controversy and asserting that is a safer value strategy than buying stocks with a steady up channel over time.

To each their own, but I should caution you. In this type of market, one day a company is better than "sliced bread". The next day, its mentioned in the same sentence as Enron.

My reasoning is simple on this one. I am reading that many VCs are hurting right now b/c many of their portfolio companies may go bankrupt. Therefore, if this is true, how can MCGC stay profitable when many VCs are worried?

MCGC is not a value stock as defined by Graham and Dodds. Instead, I view it as a risky company.

Let me ask you this question in a different way. If I theoretically put my money in the bank, I will receive 1-2%? Utility stocks are yielding approximately 3-5%.

If MCGC is yielding 10%, one is taking on risk and alot of it with respect to what the market is willing to pay with respect to Dividend yields.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext