SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 322.32-5.6%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike M who wrote (64522)6/23/2002 9:48:29 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (4) of 70976
 
There is no proof of Iraq being associated with El Queada, as far as know. Bin Ladin seems to have proposed to Saudi Arabia to "take on Saddam, after all, he is far from being religious and his regime is a secular dictatorship, not an Islamic one. In essence quite similar to Mubarak and Musharef. Both Egypt and Pakistan have major Islamic insurgencies brewing within their borders, and the danger of such nukes falling into the insurgent extremists' hands is just as great as the danger Saddam develops such a weapon. Don't misunderstand me, I don't particularly like Saddam, I just think that the approach should differ, unless, once more Saddam presents a clear and demonstrable threat that can be shown to the rest of the world, and that world clamors for us to do something about it. Generally, we should use our overwhelming power as a deterrent. I fear however, that internal politics (deteriorating economics and the coming congressional contest), like in many other countries, may lead to international adventurism. Many world conflagrations have started that way.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext