SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lorne Larson who wrote (3520)6/23/2002 1:14:25 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn   of 11633
 
In your examples you calculate PWI's gain from a $5950 starting point,

------ To make it clearer for you I use for the person P staying with one trust and adding on weakness keeping record of total number of units bought and average cost -------

and calculate the other examples from a $7000 starting point.

------ I use for the person L switching, $7000 ,because that is what he uses what he starts with. From his first trust he suffers a loss. He switches. He does not add anymore money but uses what is left from the $7000 namely $5950. So L's cost base is always that starting $7000. P's cost base becomes that $7000 plus what he added by accumulating $29000 ----- All this was done because of the original argument. You said that a person switching will get better returns as a result. I said that a person staying with the same trust and not switching but accumulating at the lows would fair much better. Thats what the examples clearly show. --------

This is either plain stupidity or intentionally misleading. I've calculated both examples from the same starting point, namely the original $7000 investment.

------ You change the terms of the discussion. Only when it becomes clear your wrong. Then say how right you are. YOUR NOT. ---------
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext