SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ish who wrote (15518)6/23/2002 10:35:10 PM
From: chalu2  Read Replies (2) of 23908
 
So far, no one at all likes Judeofascist, finding it nasty and unacceptable. Oh, except possibly for Thomas, Len and Gustave (but we'll wait for them to specifically opine).

There has been one alteration--Islamikazi to Islamistkazi. My guess is that people will need some time to absorb the change in terminology before weighing in on "Islamistkazi."

One poster sees nothing wrong with IsRAELi. It has been a continuing mystery why 4 middle letters are capitalized, making it is difficult to be offended, as no one quite understands this one. If there was an explanation, I missed it. Len? (Please note that if there is a forthcoming explanation of IsRAELi, those who have already voted will have a chance to change their vote).

One poster objects to Chomskofascist, and believes that its use renders a post simply unreadable. That same poster but has not expressed the identical opinion about Judeofascist, however.

That's a small sampling so far--we obviously need more readers to weigh in on this.

For those just joining us, here is the original survey question:

I am taking an informal poll. Which of the following terms do readers here find objectionable?:

Judeofascist

Islamofascist

Chomskofascist

Islamikazis (now Islamistkazis)

IsRAELis

PaleSTAINians

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext