SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (15377)6/24/2002 3:49:23 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
That is a point of view, of course.

If there is an objective moral order, one cannot make it up as one goes along, and one has to begin with the basic facts of human life. Take it as a working hypothesis, not ratifying every detail of social life, but serving as a basis to critique social life. What is the advantage of such an assumption? Well, it means that there is something to tether our fancy as we consider what rules man should live by, or what table of values should be subscribed. It means that we have something to discuss when in conflict over moral ideas, rather than having no recourse but violence to resolve things. It means that we have to seek some coherence in our moral notions, rather than being totally whimsical and self- serving. It means that moral progress is a real possibility, as we critique current practices and bring them more into conformity with the result of moral reflection. It means that we do not have to choose between the fanaticism which made the Nazis a force to be reckoned with, or the lassitude which made the West allow them to become formidable through appeasement: we can be firm and energetic in our convictions, without being mystical and fanatic..........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext