THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lazarus_Long who started this subject	6/25/2002 10:39:03 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 21057

I found this snippet in Howard Kurtz's column in today's Post. <<Josh Marshall detects a greatly undercovered security issue: "Is the Bush administration creating the new Department of Homeland Security in its own image? It sure seems that way. This article in the Washington Times if anything doesn't ring out the full measure of irony in the story's topic. "According to the article, the administration's proposed legislation specifically exempts the department from the federal whistleblower law and the Freedom of Information Act. "Didn't we find out about the problems that prompted the creation of the Homeland Security Department because of whistleblowers and releases of embarrassing information? "Perhaps it shouldn't come as such a surprise since the announcement of the plans for the department were timed to overshadow the very damning testimony of FBI whistleblower Coleen Rowley. But still, it's little short of astounding. Why isn't more being made of this?" Journalists, you have your marching orders.>>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next