Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 170.90

-1.3%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnG who wrote (24218)	6/27/2002 11:08:20 AM
From: foundation	of 196549

John - re: Sync Channel ========== First, the sync channel issue hasn't slowed Release A developments, including 307kbs performance, at all. Release A was approved, and development is not being slowed by sync channel deliberations. I was told that Korean carriers were running "Release A" tests at the World Cup, and Korea is where you will see it first. Adding a sync channel software patch - if it becomes necessary - will be a menial task, or so I've been told by more than 1 engineer. It is primarily Korean carriers and vendors who are against the patch. The cdma2000 specification is running perfectly well as is - the problem is not with the specification. The problem is with non-standard-compliant 95A handsets manufactured by 2 vendors, and their ability to function on 1x networks. Korea - rightly, I believe - is against establishing the precedent of modifying the standard to bail out 2 vendors. What will happen the next time a vendor blows the standard? Continue to bolt on patches? Also, there is uncertainty how the sync channel fix will effect the standard over the long term. The 2 vendors who fucked their handsets up - plus carriers who have lots of these handsets on their networks (like PCS) - are the prime proponents for the patch. A number of 3GPP2 members like VZ are rather indifferent. Supermajority votes are required to pass legislation, and neither party has been able to close a vote. The Steering Committee has tried to bring the matter to conclusion, with mixed results. Regarding Release A development, sync channel is a peripheral issue. It may well be that a sync channel patch - if required - can be downloaded via BREW in the field at some future date. The cleanest solution is, of course, recall of the defective 95A handsets - especially with carriers wanting 95A handsets out and 1x handsets in circulation for capacity increases. Seems a no-brainer, and I think this may be why things remain in flux.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next